shared at author’s request, with editing of punctuation and addition of paragraph breaks for easier reading, but no changes to language or content
“SECURITY CONCERNS ON FLORIDA’S DEATH ROW”
By Ronald Wayne Clark Jr.
MORE FROM Ronald W. Clark
Staff has brought a street knife on to Florida’s death row, getting past pat downs and the metal detector and sold the knife to a death row inmate jeopardizing the integrity of a maximum security housing unit.
Which one of these officer’s did it? How much or what favors did they get? Good question!
Unfortunately its a question that I can’t give you the answer too. But what I can tell you is this, that it should be no surprise when you have an administration that places hostile staff back here in the death row housing unit, who runs around trying to create and promote inmate on inmate violence.
That’s right correctional officer’s who are not only telling other inmates you should kill so and so, but we have a Sgt in here, who’s been promoting and engaging in that type of hostile propaganda for the past several years. They can deny that, but what they can’t deny, is these fact, that on Tuesday January 14, 2025 UCI death row Administration staff moved two known white supremacist armed with knives off of 4 wing right side bottom floor which is lock down, administrative confinement, and placed them on 2 wing second floor to kill Matthew Caylor, and other inmates that staff had issues with.
Fortunately for Caylor and the others, there was a stand up man Marquis Lloyd up there with them who’s trained in the martial arts, when Dayroom opened just moments after they were placed up there to commit these murderous acts for staff, Marquis stepped out of his cell with his hands as his only weapon, and disarmed both of the white supremacist making them lay down face first on the floor in a puddle of blood waiting for staff to eventually come on to the wing and remove them. Marquis was wounded in this staff orchestrated assault that didn’t turn out the way staff intended. Marquis was placed in solitary confinement with a broken arm, where the Administration was denying him medical treatment because he foiled their homicidal plot. And staff cannot get around these facts that they brought two armed white supremacist on to that wing to kill for them!
The white supremacist are now confined to solitary confinement, where the staff turned against them for telling that Administrative Staff was the ones behind it.
There’s also a paper trail to substantiate that Matthew Caylor had tried to be placed on special review and get protection from one of these white supremacist who was on death row for killing a convicted child molester, which is evidence that Caylor’s fears of being assaulted and or killed by the known white supremacist had validity, the denied or unaddressed request for protection further show that he was placed in harms way by a bunch of corrupt unethical correctional officer’s who tried to have him murdered by other inmates.
Matthew Caylor would commit suicide in August of 2025 knowing that he had no where else to turn and couldn’t turn to an administration that was trying to have him killed.
Welcome to the corrupt unethical world of the Florida Department of Corrections where staff jeopardizes security placing vengeance and violence over their duty to serve and protect those in their care custody and control.
If you didn’t know, now you do! What’s your excuse?
One thing is for certain, this entire Administration and all death row staff should be cleared out and posted in other institutions outside of UCI and death row housing before they have success in another scheme to murder death row inmates. I’m asking you the reader to contact and provide this essay to your local state senator and House Representative, ask them to contact the FDOC and request the incident reports for the Tuesday January 14, 2025 failed homicide plot and all other documents relevant to this essay.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely Ronald Wayne Clark Jr. 812974
NOTE ON CENSORSHIP
December 15, 2025
This document can’t be censored as its protected by the 1st Amendment under Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396 (1974) “The United States Supreme Court emphatically stated that mere complaints and disrespectful comments cannot be ground for refusing to send or deliver a letter.” In Osterback v. Ingram, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20944: 13 Fia. L. Weekly Fed. D.133 The United States District Court For The Northern District of Florida stated unequivocally that, “Prison officials may not censor inmate correspondence simply to eliminate unflattering or unwelcome opinions or factually inaccurate statements.” The Court’s went on to say, “Further mere complaints and disrespectful comments cannot be ground for refusing to send or deliver a letter. Censorship for violations of prison disciplinary rules is properly limited to communications that relate to more concrete violations such as escape plans, plans for disruption of prison system or work routine, or plans for the importation of contraband.” Further supported in McNamara v Moody, 606 F. 2d 621@624(5th Cir. 1979). See also Loggins v Delo, 999 F. 2d 364 @367 (8th Cir. 1993) (Where a prisoner’s offensive language in a letter does not implicate security concerns disciplinary action against the inmate violates the 1st Amendment.) This essay was written with intentions to correct security flaws that are clearly evident by the pocket knife found on Wednesday December 10,2025 and the attempted homicide on Tuesday January 14, 2025 orchestrated by staff who placed the two armed inmates on 2 wing, therefore any type of censorship will be in violation of the 1st Amendment.
(document, dated as sent Dec 17, arrived in inbox on Dec 19)
